April 28, 2008

Common Control Myths - Old and Unimproved

By Greg McMillan

I dug up the following myths from my April 2006 Control Talk column in Control Magazine. I am into recycling and going green. In fact these myths may be a bit moldy.

(26) Auto tuners can compute controller tuning settings with an accuracy of more than one significant figure. Act surprised when unmeasured disturbances, load changes, valve stick-slip, and noise cause each result to be different. Look forward to the opportunity to play bingo with the second digit.

(27) You can just dump all your historical data into a neural network and get wonderful results. Forget about the same stuff that cause auto tuners to have problems and use variables drawing straight lines because anything that smooth or well controlled must be important. Use the controlled variables (process variables) instead of the manipulated variables (controller outputs). Don't try to avoid extraneous inputs or identification of the control algorithm instead of the process. If you want to purse a career in data processing, use every variable.

(28) Models can predict a process variable that is not measured in the field or lab. Great way to spur creativity in training a neural network and validating a first principal model plus it has the added bonus of the model never being wrong. Wait till your customers figure out something is wrong with the composition of your product. Discount as hearsay any suggestions that even the best models need periodic correction.

(29) To reduce variability in process outputs (temperatures and compositions), keep all the process inputs (flows) constant. Keep believing that you can fix both the process inputs and outputs and don't accept the notion that process control must transfer variability from process outputs to process inputs to compensate for disturbances.

(30) Positioners should not be used on fast loops. This was true for the good old days of pneumatic positioners and analog controllers. Surely, digital positioners with tuning settings and digital control system scan times can't make the original theoretical concerns less important than the practical issues of real valves. If you would rather believe the controller outputs are the actual valve positions, and just want valve problems to slip by, save some bucks on your project and only put positioners on slow loops. Just don't stick around for start up.



11 Comments

Interesting post, joined your rss feed. cya as I'm interested in the world of gambling ;-)

I just bookmarked your site, so glad I found it

I just bookmarked your site, so glad I found it

this is important information, I appreciate your contribution

good stuff, I was looking for info on this on google and found you, thanks alot for posting.

excellent post, I was looking for info on this on google and found you, thanks alot for this

I wanted to thank you for this great I definitely loved every little bit of it. I have you bookmarked your web site to look at the latest stuff you post.

Wow!, this was a top quality post. In theory I'd like to write like this too - taking time and real effort to make a good article... but what can I say... I procrastinate a lot and never seem to achieve anything

The average person thinks he isn't. Father Larry Lorenzoni-

That was a reasonably necessary perception for me personally

Nice I found your blog post, lots of interesting stuffs out here. The information part of it was fine, and you have done bit of research thing, good job! Hope to read more posts in future. Try engaging new things. Keep the good work going.


Leave a comment


Subscribe

Subscribe to site RSS Feed


Or, subscribe by email:

Archives

The opinions expressed here are the personal opinions of Greg McMillan and Terry Blevins. Content published here is not read or approved by Emerson before it is posted and does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of Emerson. © 2006-2010 Greg McMillan and Terry Blevins. All rights reserved.